What made Germany the Bad Guy before World War 2 was kicked off or any actions against Europe’s jewish population were ever initiated?

History is a ‘timeline’.  An event takes place, then another, then another.  Documenting and analyzing the effects and results of “events” is what the study of history is all about.  Sometimes the “timeline” is inconvenient to the ‘narrative’ but, as Churchill (!@#$%) said: “The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.” 

The first thing Hitler did when he became Chancellor of Germany on 30 January 1933 is implement his public works programs to put the German People back to work.  The various programs he implemented were estimated at a cost of one billion units of national currency. Problem was Germany was bankrupt so, rather than run out and float bonds to get this billion Reichsmarks (at interest) from the German central bank or their international equivalents, which were all owned/controlled by the Rothchild’s (then and still), the German government issued their own bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates. In this way they began the process to put millions of people to work, paying them with these Treasury Certificates.

Less than two months later, on 24 March 1933, (before Hitler or Germany initiated ANY actions against the jewish folks in Germany or the many foreigners who were illegally present in Germany) London’s Daily Express’ front page announced that “Jews of all the World” declared an economic ‘war’ against Germany.  These direct actions included boycotting all German products and financial operations, disruption of German foreign commerce, a ‘world-wide’ anti-German propaganda campaign and international jewish financial institutions began pressuring Gentile owned businesses including insurance, shipping and other business interests to also honor the declared jewish “war” for the express purpose of embargoing German industry and crippling Germany and its government and regime change.

So, the very people who owned/controlled Germany’s Central Bank, who pulled the strings of essentially the entire world’s banking system as well as owning controlling interest in most media, radio and publishing (then and now), who, through money speculation and more had ‘caused’ Germany’s hyperinflation during the Weimar period and devastated the German economy, angered by Germany’s comeuppance to issue their own “Labor Treasury Certificates” in order to stabilize the economy rather than ‘borrow’ money (at interest from them), declared publicly a “war” against Germany and its people.  Their decree included ALL jewish folks world-wide as well as anyone (not jewish) whom they could pressure into joining the blockade/war by way of their influence over banking.  They declared openly that ‘they’ were an existential threat to Germany’s survival.  Little wonder that after Germans watched as 900,000 fellow Germans die by starvation between 1918-1919 due to the Britain’s postwar food ‘blockade’ and that this “declaration” (above) this blockade was intended to be worldwide and to destroy the German people and nation entirely, that Germany’s government would respond by acknowledging that the jews were, in fact, an “existential threat” and begin to act accordingly? 

We have a saying in the US:  “who threw the first punch?”  which usually indicates who started  a conflict.

The response from Germany was swift.  On 7 April the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service which excluded Jews and the “politically unreliable” from civil service.  (Who wouldn’t want those people committed to a self-declared “war” on Germany and its People to be removed from any positions ‘within’ the German government where they may use their influence and power to further subvert the Germany?)  Twenty three months later they refined their citizenship rules to deprive jews of German citizenship.  Those remaining in Germany became “subjects of the state” rather than full citizens.  (NOTE:  This is little different than Israel’s current Laws in 2023 stripping citizenship from Palestinians living in Israel.  The Law also allows for the deportation of those whose citizenship is revoked under the Israeli guise of “pursuit of its commitment to establish two separate legal systems based on Jewish supremacy.”)

Imagine, for a moment, here in the US, that the muslims openly declared Jihad on us and commenced organized warfare against this country destroying infrastructure, military and government installations.  We, like the Germans, would take steps to isolate and remove these people from everyday life in America just as we did the Japanese at the onset of the second World War.  

Interestingly, while sanctions and embargos against all of Germany, its industries and its foreign commerce were in full swing thanks to the jewish ‘declaration of war’, according to Sheldon Emry’s book Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People 1984: “Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years.  (when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries, controlled by these same jewish international bankers, were still out of work.) The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”  C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism and a Trotsky intimate said in a 1938 interrogation:  “Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery … and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of other states?”   So much for ‘sanctions and ’embargoes’, eh?

That is why Germany and Hitler was branded the “Bad Guy” within two months of his being appointed Chancellor and six years before World War 2 ever began.  He thwarted the International Central Bankers cartel, printed Germany’s own currency without ‘borrowing it’ from the Rothchilds and their ilk and thus, as Henry Liu explained:  “Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.”  So,  within two years, the unemployment problem in Germany had been solved, and the country was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by these bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.   In just a few years, Germany went from one of Europe’s weakest economies to one of the world’s strongest.

Not to be terribly callous about it but, before folks even begin to ponder the ‘cost’ of WW2 it might be worth pondering the actual “timeline” of events and ask the question: “who threw the first punch?”  

I also can’t help pondering if JFK ordering the Treasury, in June 1963, (Executive Order 11110) to begin reissuing (debt free) “United States Notes” (Silver Certificates) may have had just a smidgeon to do with the fact that he was murdered five months later in Dallas on November 22nd of that year.

Twitter revelations ~ Free ? Speech

I don’t do Twitter or the ‘other’ one.  That said I’ve read Elon dumped a bunch of evidence that the government, the White House, its agencies and its alleged power brokers were directly involved it instructing these social media sites to delete data and expressions of free speech which were, in fact, deleted and suppressed by these sites.

This evidence flies directly in the face of our First Amendment guaranteeing the Right of the People to “free speech”.  The government (of our alleged ‘free’ country) is tasked with insuring the People’s Right to “free speech” is, in fact, guaranteed.

In a ‘free’ country our government would be protecting our Rights of free speech under the First Amendment.  18 USC Code § 241 titled “Conspiracy against rights” states: “If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same… They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;”  18 USC § 242 titled “Deprivation of Rights Under The Color of Law” “Whoever, … willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;” 

If the government refuses to prosecute those who usurp our Constitution and work towards openly ‘oppressing’ the People’s Rights, such as Adam Schiff and FBI officials, et al, when Laws exist SPECIFICALLY to prosecute these very offenses then what is taking place is a conspiracy to obstruct justice.  Conspiracy to obstruct justice is covered under 42 US Code § 1985 which can result in a maximum sentence of 20 years can be imposed for conviction.  By extension then, those thwarting the indictment and prosecution of those implicated by Twitter documents and admissions of Facebook’s owner/CEO under 18 USC § 241 and 18 USC § 242 should themselves be subject to indictment & prosecution under 42 US Code § 1985.

If ALL of these people are not subject to prosecution and held accountable for their violation of Laws then, simply put, you are living in a dictatorship where our Constitution has been overthrown and any Laws published by them should be ignored.  WAKE UP.  Smell the coffee and PLEASE stop talking about “a nation of Laws”, “making America great again” or any stupid reference to “democracy”.  Put a freaking fork in it.

~Bearing Arms~ Legalistic Word-Salad Changing the Word “NOT” to “CAN”

I wrote a previous piece on gun control and was told it might’ve been too long.  https://resistancetononsense.wordpress.com/2018/06/29/our-preexisting-irrevolkable-right-of-self-defense/  I try here to boil it down a bit.

Our Constitution created our government.  Before the delegates would agree to ‘create’ that government they added ‘protections & limitations’ to government power.  These are known as the Bill of Rights or the first ten Amendments.  The one being discussed herein is our Second Amendment which precludes the new government’s power over personal arms.  It states that the Right of the People to bear arms “shall not be infringed.”  The word “NOT” demonstrates the delegates were precluding the proposed government from having the authority/power to “infringe” on the People bearing arms.

When our Constitution was written it was crafted such that the normal Citizen could (and did) understand what it meant.  It wasn’t written in ancient Sanskrit, Cyrillic Russian or Hebrew.  Very few had any advanced education therefore the words used had clear, commonly understood meaning.  The country’s population, at that time, was primarily English speaking, Christian common people and it was written in plain everyday English.  No one was required to interpret what our Constitution meant.  

The government today tells us that ‘they’ have the authority and power to “interpret” our Constitution.  Specifically, they’ve interpreted the word “not” in the Second Amendment to, in fact, mean “can”.  Thus, rather than not having the authority to “infringe” on a Right that preexisted the very formation of the government itself, they can pass any law they wish “infringing” on anyone’s Right to bear arms by the vote of a mere 67 members of the US Senate.

Now, any kid graduating from a high school Civics course or any first year Law student will tell you that our Constitution’s meaning can only be ‘lawfully’ changed by way of ‘amending’ our Constitution via Article V of our Constitution.  In fact, changing our our federal Constitution actually requires 290 votes in the House of Representatives, 67 votes in the Senate and must be approved by a minimum of 38 of our state Legislatures ~ a process, so difficult, it’s only been navigated 27 times during the entire history of our nation.  Anyone who tells you that the government, by itself, can change the meaning of an existing Amendment that’s part of our Constitution, by “interpreting” the word “NOT” to mean “can” is, simply, a liar, a cheat or a loquacious jewish lawyer.

Let’s look at this another way.  Where our Constitution is our People’s ‘fundamental Law’ let’s look at some other “fundamental Law”.  Since we have a good number of Christians in this country, let’s look at the Ten Commandments.  These are said to be rules handed down by God that are, without equivocation (sort-a like our Constitution), to be adhered to.  The Tenth Commandment instructs: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife”.  There’s that word “not” again.  Most of us, who can still fog a mirror, would take that to mean God intended that You “CAN’T” covet your neighbor’s wife.

Using our (above) government official’s belief regarding our Second Amendment, where they interpret the pivotal word “not” as “can”, apparently they would claim God (actually) intended that you could covet your neighbor’s wife given certain criteria (that they establish) without consulting God.  Perhaps, were she was really ‘hot’ or, if in the interpreter’s mind, they were sure that she ‘wanted you’ then, screw your neighbor and have your way with his wife.

Now, call me silly but, I think most Christians who ‘believe’ in God’s Ten Commandments would tell those nitwit bureaucrats that one can’t nuance or “interpret” what God said which was “SHALL NOT” into “can”.  Likewise, most Americans, who ‘believe’ in our Constitution would likely NOT buy into the government’s interpretation that when the Second Amendment’s restriction on government saying “SHALL NOT” infringe on the bearing of arms properly suddenly means they can infringe given they apply whatever criteria that they make up.

Given the fact that the government can not lawfully change the meaning of our Constitution arbitrarily and independently without using the Article V Amendment Process, every single alleged ‘gun’ Law, restriction, limitation of or tax passed and enforced is a violation of the Constitution itself.  Everyone participating is passing such unconstitutional acts has violated their Oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same”. They HAVE usurped our Constitution, breached their Oath are are, in a very real way, committing Treason.

So, with any due respect you might expect to be granted, if you personally ‘believe’ that the government can change “SHALL NOT” into ‘we sure can’ you should take your lying, word-salad spinning, leftist, anti-Constitutional ass and get the hell out of MY country because the rest of us have had enough of your ‘type’.  If my remarks ‘offend’ you then my advice is to “interpret” the remark below in a text you’re probably familiar with:

Economic Blockades & Sanctions

I was pondering Lithuania’s (NATO’s) actions against Kaliningrad and the Russian Federation’s responses.  What I find amazing is the blatant Lithuanian/NATO provocation which is so very similar to what Poland initiated against Germany and East Prussia in the run up to Germany losing patience and rolling its panzer divisions across the Polish boarder in my father’s day. 

This is yet another NATO/US provocation to garner an angry response from the Federation, this one carried out by insignificant Lithuania but ordered by Washington.  Where Kaliningrad can NOT (legally) be unilaterally be cut off from mainland Russia due to an agreement (treaty) between the European Union and Russia, the Alliance is simply trying to force the Russians into a misstep which, they hope, will gather more support for their plans for the Russian state.  It’s simply, an act of international aggression.

It will be interesting to watch this play out.  What would be more interesting would be to see the Russian Federation play some hard-ball while NOT making the misstep that Washington and NATO hope/expect that they make.

Were I calling the shots over there I think I would craft a diplomatic statement for presentation to Lithuania while having copies of the statement delivered to every NATO member and/or NATO ‘candidate’.  While the diplomatic ‘note’ was delivered to all of NATO simultaneously I would have the Federation’s Foreign Minister, Mr Lavrov deliver the same message, via every media outlet they could convince to cover it such that EVERYONE (the world’s civilian population) saw exactly what the ‘measured’ Russian position was.  Simply stated:

“The Russian Federation sees the blockade of Kaliningrad not only a hostile act but a total violation of the agreement between the European Union and the Russian government bordering on outright aggression.  If Lithuania/NATO does not reverse course within six (6) hours the Federation will declare “Force majeure” with respect to any commitments to supply energy related commodities to not just Lithuania but all member states of NATO who are clearly complicit in the on-going hostile acts being applied to Russia.  This will apply to ALL entities/corporations headquartered or related to such corporations across the NATO membership”

The reality is that there’s simply no reason to carry out trade with hostile nations.  An articulated position such as that above would simply be a wake-up call.  NATO and their masters in Washington, when put under pressure, couldn’t tie their shoes in six hours so it’s safe to say the deadline wouldn’t be met.  At which point Russia turns off all energy in-transit to Europe/NATO.  (NATO members would then need to contract with non-NATO countries/entities to meet/broker their energy needs which would be a ‘boon’ countries ‘friendly’ to Russia who were positioned to contract for and trans-ship energy to NATO members.)  A further announcement would then be made:

“Since the blockade of Kaliningrad continues, if Lithuania/NATO does not reverse course within two (2) hours the the Federation will declare “Force majeure” with respect to any present and future contracts/commitments to supply any further commodities originating within the Russian Federation such as food and/or raw materials to any member state of NATO.”

Once again NATO members would scramble to respond but now panic would set in.  There would now be serious talk of having to leave NATO in order to preserve order, authority in the face of economic collapse within the member states.  The true ‘cost’ of NATO membership would be weighed in every capital.

None of these pronouncements would really (financially) adversely effect the Russians.  The flow of oil, gas, fertilizer or food wouldn’t stop going to Europe/NATO.  The effect would be they (NATO members) would no longer control their fate because they would need to pay brokers (from countries ‘friendly’ to the Federation) to facilitate deliveries which would likely significantly increase costs.

Very likely these measures would erode if not ‘break’ NATO members rather quickly.  I suspect the first to roll over, via a national referendum to leave NATO, would be Germany.  Once one nation split with the NATO alliance more dominos would fall.  The result would be that US assets (manpower and equipment would be asked to leave and forward bases shut down) would be hard pressed to remain in Europe and thus, the danger (felt by the Russians) of a NATO attack on Russian territory would be alleviated.

Depending upon how the Russians played their cards with any/all defecting NATO members (treating them as equals and partners, unlike how Russia was treated by the west after the Soviet state collapsed through exploitation and dismemberment) could well set the stage for age of peace for hundreds of years.

Russia Could (should?) Respond To Sanctions

Numerous NATO countries are claiming they will send a host (thousands) of missiles ~ anti-air and anti-tank to Ukraine to be used against Russian Federation forces.  The EU has closed its airspace to ALL Russian owned and/or operated aircraft, including privately owned aircraft and are talking of trying to impose a ‘no-fly zone’ over Ukraine as they unilaterally did in Libya.  European governments are clamoring to kick Russia out of the Swift banking system and imposing all manner of sanctions in order to “hurt them” and are saying they will seize assets, bank accounts and real estate.  France has even seized a Russian flagged vessel transiting the English Channel (international waters) allegedly claiming the ship was subject to some of the Western sanctions.

Any one of these things such as aiding an enemy, militarily, in a time of war or threatening to shoot down Russian air assets over the war zone is, itself, an act of war where no aggression has been initiated by Russia against NATO or the EU.  It utterly amazes me that the Western leaders can be so incredibly stupid to open themselves to retaliation by the Federation yet, they do.

Imagine for a moment the Russians embraced the English concept of tit-for-tat or “equivalent retaliation” and started implementing the same types of actions the NATO/EU/Western powers are playing with.  The West’s response would be to cry from the rooftops that Putin was overreacting where no ‘reaction’ was warranted.

What if the Russians implemented a ‘no-fly zone’ over Ukraine preemptively?  Any Western nations attempting to deliver arms to Ukraine by air would be subject to being shot down.  Anyone thinking the Europeans will risk their aircraft to breach a ‘no-fly zone’ over a war-zone the likes of which they, themselves allowed to be enforced over Libya, when the West destroyed and decapitated that nation unilaterally without UN authorization are dreaming.

What if, in response to NATO/EU precluding Russian owned or operated aircraft Rights to overfly Europe, Russia shut down its 6,612,073 square miles of airspace to the EU/US?  What if Belarus added their 80,200 square miles of airspace the Russian airspace closure?  What if Syria added their 71,500 square miles of airspace and Iran added their 636,374 square miles of airspace to the Russian airspace closure?  What if the member states of the Collective Security Treaty Organization members (allied with the Russian Federation) ~ Armenia 1,700 sq. miles, Kazakhstan 1,052,084 sq. miles, Kyrgystan 2,703 sq. miles, Tajikistan 55,213 sq. miles, and Uzbekistan 278,001 sq. miles) closed their airspace adding 1,389,701 square miles to Russia’s 6,612,073 square miles for a total of 8,001,774 over eight million square miles of the globe closed to the West’s overflights.  Imagine if China (3.7 million sq. miles) joined them?

While annoying, closing airspace isn’t going to really ‘hurt’ anyone trying to ‘hurt’ the Russians.  What might make a bigger impression?

Clearly the West’s enjoying this “hurt them” sanction game.  Has anyone considered the tit-for-tat that the Russians could very well play?  I think not.  The good guys need to remember that ‘hurting’ Russia might have some consequences for Europe & beyond.  After all, Russia does supply 24 million plus tons of coal to them and 20% of the EU’s electricity comes from coal.  Russia also supplies 40% of Europe’s natural gas that heat their home, runs their industry and manufactures their fertilizers for agriculture.  They also support 27% of Europe’s oil supply.  Hell, Russia is the second largest supplier of oil to the US as well!  What if “tit-for-tat” translated to Russia turning off that energy source?  Europe would collapse in less than a month.  

What if, rather than shut off the spigot, Russia simply said “The uncertainties caused by the West’s manipulations of the currency markets and sanctions intended to damage the Russian economy has resulted in our decision that all transactions in Russia’s energy markets will, from today, only be settled in gold and/or silver bullion.  All shipments, as of today, shall be paid, in advance and, said bullion shall be delivered to Moscow in advance of shipments.”  Thus, no one could claim that Russia (that meanie) shut off Europe’s energy, rather, they simply required to be paid in real money that couldn’t be manipulated or renounced after the transaction concluded.

Now apply the impact of Russian exported energy denominated in bullion vs fiat currencies to just a couple of other exports that Russia supplies.  Consider wheat (29% of the world’s wheat), fertilizer (2/3rds of the world’s fertilizer) ~ top world producer, Russia now controls Ukraine’s export of neon gas (90% of America’s consumption) for laser manufacturing of the global chip industry ~ you think there was a chip shortage over the last few months?

The result would be far worse for the West than any sanctions imposed on Russia.  It might well collapse the fiat banking system all together.  Certainly, the US dollar would collapse with world-wide banking transactions switching overnight from a dollar denominated system to, once again, a bullion denominated market.  What choice would the West have but to pay in the medium of exchange required?  The spot price of gold, as a result of this Russian move, could jump from $1,900+ an ounce to $60,000. an ounce very short order.  So much for the bankers manipulating the bullion markets.  JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Citibank, Bank of America and many other major banks controlling the bullion markets would be tits up almost overnight.  With them in the dumpster the FDIC and the US stock Exchanges would join them shortly.

Just the denominating of Russian energy assets into bullion would, I believe, end this Ukrainian fiasco in a New York minute and the establishment of bullion as a medium would only need to be applied to the nations hostile to Russian interests.  Neutral and unaligned nations need not be placed under this payment regime. The West’s often touted “New World Order” would be upon them in a heartbeat.  The problem would be that it wouldn’t be ‘their’ New World Order.

People might ponder the fact that the Russian’s economy is run based on the “Russia first” principle.  Russia takes care of (supplies her own needs) “first” before exporting anything.  Further, they run an annual international trade ‘surplus’  wherein they’re more than paying their own bills.  Can the western nations running annual deficits say that?  When the West’s fiat currencies and derivative laden banking systems are forced to ‘pay’ for Russian exports with real money (bullion) how long will their economies last?

Musings on the Ukraine & NATO’s Russian Fantasy:

In this piece I’m not going to speak of the context of the US/Russia & Ukraine beyond reminding folks that the Russians (some 3 million) were slaughtered in WW1 because their opponent was able to mobilize faster and strike across the frontier at an ill prepared motherland.  WW2 was a bit different in that the Russians were mobilizing to effect a first strike against the Germans but the Germans, seeing the build-up chose to strike first (Operation Barbarossa) before Russian forces were prepared.  Slaughter, again ensued and before the war’s end some 27 million Russians died which engrained in the Russian cultural/racial memory that never again will they wait to be kicked in the nuts.

When the Soviets (the bad guys) installed their sock puppet (Castro) in Havana, Cuba and started deploying their ballistic missiles (pointed at US targets) the US was rightfully ‘miffed’.  Essentially it came down to get your missiles out of Cuba or all-out WAR will ensue.  The Soviets withdrew their missiles.

The current manufactured ‘crisis’ is little different except the US overthrew Ukraine’s elected government (right on Russia’s border), installed their sock-puppet fascist government and are now emplacing significant weapons (pointed at Russia) including the Aegis Ashore system (Google it) which is quite capable of launching nuclear warheads.  Throw in some ethnic cleansing of Russian citizens on the part of Ukraine’s neo-nazis and those being “cleansed” declaring independence from the US/Ukraine fascist regime and you have the makings of a powder keg reminiscent of the Cuban Missile Crisis.  Essentially the Russians, like the US in the sixties) finds all of this unacceptable and have been very clear on their unhappiness and the West has told them to piss up a rope.

In spite of this reality all we hear from the political ‘class’ and their media prostitutes is:

If provoked ‘enough’, the Russians will, of course, move on Ukraine.  Were Ukraine’s fascists to move against the Russian population in Donbass who’ve declared (2014) independence, Russia will react ‘asymmetrically’.  If NATO moves to incorporate Ukraine into its alliance,  the Russians will move on Ukraine ‘asymmetrically’.  There’s little doubt here; it’s ‘expected’ even by NATO.

In addition to the endless provocations exacerbating this crisis the US has threatened economic sanction and ‘political’ countermeasures if the Russian Bear stirs further.  Where the US has been imposing endless and increasing ‘sanctions’ on Russia since 2012 and politically opposed Russian interests since the Soviet government imploded, Russian leadership may just be saying to itself “Who gives a f__ck?”

With advanced weapons pouring into Ukraine from the US it’s only a matter of time (perhaps February/March 2021) before the crackpots in Kiev use them against Donbass or even Crimea.  For those not paying attention, on 24 March 2021, the lunatics in Kiev, (Zelensky president/Ukraine), issued Decree 117/2021.  It said:  “1. To put into effect the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of March 11, 2021 “On the Strategy of deoccupation and reintegration of the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol” (attached).

2. To approve the Strategy of deoccupation and reintegration of the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (attached).

3. Control over the implementation of the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, enacted by this Decree, shall be vested in the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine.

4. This Decree shall enter into force on the day of its publication.”

The fifty cent translation is Kiev’s declaring Ukraine’s intent to seize Crimea from Russia, by force.  Were Mexico to declare their intent to seize Texas and reincorporate it into Mexico does anyone think Fort Bliss would be standing down or would Major General Sean Bernabe’s 1st Armored Division be prepositioning assets to meet whatever goofiness Mexico chose to initiate against the territory of the United States & Texas?

So, as idiocy goes, poking, prodding and acting stupid eventually will get a response from the Russian Bear.  My guess is the Russians will roll across the border of Donbass and take up defensive positions protecting that region from Ukraine.  Then what? Well, we can count on Washington’s “economic sanctions and ‘political’ countermeasures” along with a bunch of threatening bluster.  Might even see a few shots fired from the left and the right.

I envision Washington starting with booting Russia out of the SWIFT system and targeting Russian banking entities some more.  Where Russia has already dumped virtually all Dollar denominated reserves from it sovereign wealth funds and foreign reserves (replacing them with gold bullion) and Russia, China & India having already moved forward with a replacement to the SWIFT system the impact will be minimal.  On the other hand imagine for a moment if Russia’s response to NATO movements and further sanctions were shutting off the pipeline of natural gas to Europe.

Russia supplies between 170-203 billion cubic meters of natural gas to Europe.  This is about 40% of all EU gas.  Reserves are currently depleted ~ the EU is facing historical-low storage levels according to the managing director at BEnergy Solutions DMCC in Dubai.  Natural gas not only heats the homes of Europeans but powers their industry and is used to manufacture fertilizer for all their agriculture.  Cut that in half and Europeans will NOT support a war in Europe.  NATO, in spite of all their rainbows & unicorns, will be without support.

So what happens when sanctions & political measures fail and Russia imposes a counter embargo of LNG to Europe and, in fact, the shooting starts because Ukraine & NATO doesn’t like it when Donbass is seized/protected by Russian ground forces.  Well, planes and missiles will fly and armored groups will roll.  When that happens folks should consider certain realities that their governments and media haven’t been telling them because civilians just don’t read Janes (https://www.janes.com/defence-news/)

The west might be reminded of the USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) affair which, on 10 April 2014, was overflown by a single Sukhoi-24 fighter while carrying out provocations in the Black Sea.  The Donald Cook is a 4th Generation guided missile destroyer equipped with the most sophisticated Aegis Combat Systems our Navy has, fifty anti-aircraft missiles and the latest Tomahawk cruise missiles yet, when the Russian fighter approached it, every combat system was turned off like something out of the scifi show Battlestar Galactica where the ‘Cylons’ eviserated the good guys by way of their electronic counter measures.  Then, the Sukhoi flew leisurely low level passes over the ship, even waving to it’s crew as it slowly passed their combat bridge.  Upon returning to port 27 sailors of the Cook’s crew requested to be relieved from active service.

As recently as October/November 2021 NATO was embracing the suck again with their F35 advanced fighters who suffered serious effects from coming within range of Russian border defenses at Murmansk.  The Russian’s BN electronic warfare systems shut down (jammed) the F-35’s avionics such that it’s said, it was like “trying to fly a brick”.  In November they successfully took out one of their own, defunct Tselina satellites using one of their S-500 anti-air ground systems proving that any earth satellites are within Russian purview using their anti-air missiles.

So imagine for a moment just how bright the ‘leaders’ are who insist of poking the Bear when the Bear has publicly said that if they’re threatened they WILL attack “asymmetrically” and they will hit the countries where the orders “originated” to threaten them (US targets) rather than only in the theater of conflict.  Imagine for a moment thinking your sanctions will have some effect when the nation sanctioned throws a switch and cuts all of Europe’s industrial productivity in half, cuts Europe’s agricultural efficiency by half and leaves much of the European population cold this winter.  Imagine for a moment sending your militaries against a world-class opponent who, at the flick of a switch, shuts down all your electronic systems (GPS, radars, communications, computers, targeting systems and electricity) upon which your militaries rely in order to engage an enemy.  Throw in hypersonic missiles (that work) traveling at Mach 15 (5 kilometers per second)  for which the Russians have in air-launch, sea-launch & ground launched variants deployed as well as a few ‘Sarmat’ (SX-X-30 Satan II) ICBMs which aren’t city killers but ‘region killers’ such that only one (1) would be needed for taking out all of France or Texas.  These warheads enter the atmosphere at hypersonic speed and move along a larger trajectory, maneuvering at a speed of 7 to 7.5 kilometers per second. 

For the believers in rainbows and unicorns planning on using everything they learned from WW2, as I pointed out here (https://resistancetononsense.wordpress.com/2016/05/24/war-in-europe/), NATO would face three times the number of main battle tanks available to NATO if only they faced Russia alone.  Unfortunately, Russia’s ally Belarus (White Russia) can field more of their own tanks than NATO can field all together.  NATO wouldn’t fair well against four to one odds which is probably why the RAND Corporation (CIA) concluded in 2015 the Russians would overrun all of Europe in 60 hours.

Sixty hours to total defeat in Europe might be wishful thinking however since we couldn’t beat the Taliban in 19 years and 10 months.  Frankly, we couldn’t even win a war fighting ourselves in spite of our dumbed down, shades of moronic, leadership purged, minority sensitive, pro-LGBTXYZ military let alone a country boasting 100 years of in-door plumbing or, God forbid, the Russians having a third of our population.  

Ukraine ~ bad idea.

P.S. Do any of the rainbow & unicorn crowd think that rolling on the Russian Bear wouldn’t be closely followed by the Chinese dropping in on Taiwan such that the US might enjoy Two-Front Fun and the full ambience of global war?

When Taiwan falls to their brethren the west may well be in quite the pickle in high-tech circles to maintain their technology without the chips supplied by the Republic of China. No Taiwan = no chips for all that neat stuff that makes the west the west. Right now 1.1 million vehicles face delays in manufacturing in the US due to a semi-conductor slowdown without the Chicoms taking Taiwan. Imagine what will be delayed when NOTHING is supplied by Taiwan.

P.S.S. The rainbow & unicorn crowd might also want to think about oil because those pesky Iranians are pals with Russia and the Straight of Hormuz is only 21 miles wide. A few speed boats and 1/3rd of the world’s natural gas and 25% of its oil consumption might not get past the Iranians. Brandon may want to open those closed pipelines before war breaks out.

Those Evil Un-Vaccinated folks

I saw a sign on a door the other days stating that masks were ‘required’ for anyone not able to prove they were vaccinated with the governments Spike Shot.  This almost makes a person, who can still fog a mirror, laugh.

Consider ~ Government, CDC, WHO et al, all admit (and have said publicly) that their shot does NOT stop you from getting their weaponized cold virus.  They’ve admitted (and have said publicly) that their shot does NOT stop you from spreading their weaponized cold virus.  The only thing their shot does is “mitigate” the symptoms of their weaponized cold virus.

So ponder two Americans ~ Me, who won’t get the Spike Shot but who takes reasonable care not to catch a seasonal bug by taking lots of vitamin D and not trading spit with anyone who’s showing symptoms.  Alas, maybe I catch their weaponized cold virus that’s fatal in less than 1% of the cases. 

I get their covid cold and stay home crying like a little school girl until I recover.   Now consider another American, you maybe, who gets the Spike Shot.  Since there’s no protection or immunity resulting from the shot, you too catch their weaponized cold virus.  However, in your case, your symptoms are mitigated so you’re not home in bed crying like a little school girl until you recover like I am.  Instead, you’re at work, at the Mall, at church and partying with your friends all the while shedding this virus to everyone whom you come in contact with.

Just who’s the alleged “super spreader” here?  (asking for a friend)

Masks & vaccines are, however, smoke-screen issues to divert your attention.  People need to remember “GAIN-OF-FUNCTION” first and foremost.  Gain-of-function is summed up quite literally as ‘make it more communicable to people and make it more dangerous’.  (“Dr. Daszak: We found other coronaviruses in bats a whole host of them. Some of them looked very similar to SARS so we sequenced the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells. Then we, well I didn’t do this work my colleagues in China did the work, you create pseuda-particles. You create a spike proteins from those viruses simply bind to human cells. each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic to people.“) So, covid was “developed” ~ we KNOW THIS.  Fauci’s communications with others involved in ‘developing’ Covid (gain-of-function) have gone public and are well documented.  There is no longer any doubt at all that he, in conjunction with others and at the behest of the US government, did ‘create/make’ the Covid 19 virus by splicing SARs and HIV as well as God knows what else and allowed it to be released into the wild. The release spawned the global Covid pandemic.  The pandemic ushered the mRNA “vaccines” which were ready for deployment before the Covid bug was ever released and the pandemic declared.  (It’s interesting to note that they’ve been playing with mRNA vaccine variants since before 2010.  Also of note is the fact that Moderna Therapeutics, was founded in 2010, and raised almost $2 billion in capital with a plan to commercialize mRNA-based vaccines and therapies172,173.  It’s of little surprise then that in October of 2019 Fauci and his pharma friends had an hour long discussion (C-span  video) covering their proposed “Universal Flu Vaccine” which was 3 months prior to the declared Covid emergency on 30 January 2020 and 5 whole months prior to the declaration of a world-wide Covid pandemic on 11 March 2020.  Damned convenient timing, eh?) The vaccines are causing all manner of secondary (non-covid) deaths from heart failure to micro-blood clots.  Simply put, this ‘event’ from start to finish is an exercise in genocide ~ a “crime against humanity”.  

“Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy.”

The perpetrators, starting with Fauci, his bosses and their bosses, every organization he funded as well as their management should be tried and hung for these “crimes against humanity” just like certain nazis were when their involvement in similar acts was concluded because what the nazis were alleged to have done will pale in comparison to the deaths these criminals have wrought.

To reiterate, gain-of-function means they made this bug which means they are responsible and thus in clear violation of the Biological Weapons Convention which went into effect in 1975.  Thus they are guilty of “crimes against humanity” for all the millions of deaths resulting from this being released as well as the millions more who will die from the tertiary effects/deaths from the deployment of the mRNA vaccines being forced upon the population.  As such, they should be tried and executed for their involvement.  Never forget that.

 

New Hampshire School Choice & ‘separation of church and state’

For those who may not have studied Constitutional Law or, sadly, been subject to state sponsored ‘public schools’ that rarely, if ever, discussed in any real detail, the fundamental principles that laid the foundation of our country, I thought I might take a moment to expound a bit on the euphemism often bantered about (incorrectly), known as “separation of church and state” in the context of school choice. These words, “separation of church and state”, are an ‘interpretation’ of the first line of our 1st Amendment which reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  Please note the word “establishment” and the phrase “prohibiting the free exercise thereof” and recognize their literal (not interpreted) meanings.

It was never the ‘original intent’ of the founders that the “state” was to purge itself of religious beliefs and/or act as some kind of ‘gatekeeper’  protecting the civil population from any particular or all, religious beliefs or customs.  The ‘original intent’ of the phrase, in our 1st Amendment, was to address the fear of the establishment of a State Church or State Religion such as they had fled from (Church of England) to come here.  Their fear (the merging church and state) they knew, results in practice, in suppressing other religions and since freedom of religion (not freedom ‘from’ religion) was, in fact, one of the prima facie reasons for the formation of the united States, the “state” would never be allowed to interfere with religion or establish a preference for one belief (creed) over another.

If “separation of church and state” was really ‘legally binding’ when it comes to funding schools having a religious ‘bent’  (as some people incorrectly believe) ~ if it were such a ‘hallowed’ American legal axiom that none should ever suggest we violate it, then why does the Federal government, in fact, fund private, religious schools?  Taxpayer dollars flow every year to Boston College (run by Jesuits) ~ College of the Holy Cross ~ Georgetown University ~ Thomas Aquinas College ~ and the University of Notre Dame (to name a few) and these are catholic colleges.  They all receive taxpayer funding through Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 which covers the administration of the united States Federal student financial aid programs.  Federal tax monies fund “Title IV aid” and half the students attending these schools receive Title IV grants and Title IV “Federal” underwritten student loans ~ these funds underwrite these religious schools.  Nor does funding only apply to the catholics.  Your Federal tax dollars offer the same Title IV financial support for protestant schools such as Davidson College ~ St. Olaf College ~ Baylor University ~ Luther College ~ and Augustana University as well as all other religious denominations throughout our country which are similarly funded/supported. 

Anyone reading the paragraph above should conclude & concede that the ‘interpretative’ phrase “separation of church and state” (as they understand it) clearly does NOT apply to ‘equally’ funding religious schools as they like to use the phrase.  The Higher Education Act of 1965 (Federal funding) does NOT discriminate against school choice even when that choice is to attend any of the 1,000 religious affiliated colleges and universities in the united States.  It could be posited that to do so ~ to ‘preclude’ funding tuition assistance equally ~ would be a direct violation of our Constitution’s 1st Amendment reading in part: “Congress shall make no law … prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

People lamenting that if school choice is equally funded, if private or religious related schools are included in any eventual tuition grant agreement, that the funding (gravy train) for these public, unaccountable citadels of state sponsored ‘learning’ might be reduced.  What they’re ‘really’ supporting, however, isn’t some interpretation of the wording of our 1st Amendment but the continuation of state run monopoly on propagandized indoctrination and the protection of little or zero accountability for performance and outcome if the guiding metric is, in fact, student grades and performance.  One should remember ‘why’ state sponsored/controlled schooling was implemented in the united States.

We can thank Horace Mann, then secretary of the Massachusetts Board of Education, seeking a way to change what he deemed the “unruly” (meaning independent) children into disciplined citizens who studied the Prussian model of public education of the 1840s and brought it home to America to be adopted nationwide.  The Prussian, forced public educational system was designed for the purpose of delivering:  “1) Obedient soldiers to the army; 2) Obedient workers for mines, factories, and farms; 3) Well-subordinated civil servants, trained in their function; 4) Well-subordinated clerks for industry; 5) Citizens who thought alike on most issues; 6) National uniformity in thought, word, and deed.”  (https://www.forcedschool.com/post/69947261758/the-prussian-model)  Given the current acknowledgment that the public school systems have generally resulted in “the dumbing down of America” I suppose what’s being supported is the maintenance of that existing status quo providing the state with a cowed, subservient and easily controlled population.  Or, given the fact that “free education for all children in public schools” was a key plank of Marx’s Communist Manifesto, perhaps they’re supporting that leftist goal.  I wonder why?

School choice reflects nothing but People making market-driven decisions.  They go for whatever resource/service will provide them the best product (if they’re allowed to “choose”) that they can afford.  It’s the very premise of ‘outsourcing’.  In our particular case (Goshen, New Hampshire) our options are the state controlled ‘pillars’ of learning such as the Newport public schools or similarly controlled venues in towns further away or the local private options.  The private options include The Montessori school in Newport or the catholic school in Sunapee both of which are far less expensive than our town hands over to the low performing ‘public’ Newport school, et al.  Another critical consideration for any parent is that based on empirical evidence such as student test scores, these two private options offer a superior education.  I chose Mount Royal, not because of any religious bent (I’m, in fact, an avowed atheist) but because of the ‘value’ of the education offered.

So, ignore the fact that school choice (including private or religious schools) hasn’t violated the 1st Amendment by establishing any church or preferential treatment towards a church.  Ignore the fact that school choice (including private or religious schools) hasn’t  interfered with the practice of anyone’s religion or lack thereof and, most importantly, ignore the fact that the government has (in fact) been supporting school choice (including private and religious schools) by funneling millions of dollars annually to over a thousand religious colleges and universities through the Higher Education Act of 1965 for over a half century.

If your preference is to adopt someone else’s personal “interpretation” of (“separation of church and state”) itself being someone’s “interpretation” of another phrase (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”) that has zero bearing on school choice given 50 years of funding of Title IV financial aid, rather than do a little research and understand the original intent of our Constitution then, by all means, ignore the facts and LISTEN to (obey) the diehard traditionalists who support and will codify a monolithic, unaccountable and failing money pit rather than any sort of competition (based of the metric of student performance) to their gravy train and ‘control’.  I’m sure the left leaning unions supporting these state schools who’s goal (rather than ‘teaching’) appear to be the maintenance of a docile people who accept anything their ‘betters’ tell them to accept, will appreciate not having to compete with better run, more cost effective (almost half the price) alternatives who provide a better product (higher test scores) and outcome for your children.  If you don’t accept these sub-par government schools then you must be some fanatical misogynist Druid, perhaps kick defenseless puppies when no one’s watching or secretly support Vlad Putin.

The Post-Election State of the Union

When an “election” takes place and the results are illegally negated resulting in the conspirators seizing power it’s called, quite simply, a coup d’état.  The very definition of a coup d’état means that your country, such that it was, has been overthrown.  It’s estimated that 161 million Americans voted in the 2020 presidential election and, according to Rasmussen polls, 30% of democrats and 70% of republicans believe the election was stolen.  The new regime was installed (inaugurated) behind tall fences and barbed wire, ushered in by 30,000 troops in the streets of Washington, who possessed no bullets for their weapons, overlooking only a sea of rainbow flags where any other President saw multitudes of Americans witnessing their swearing in.  

Unless I’m missing something, anyone still believing the ‘united’ States is anything more than another Banana republic in the Americas needs to share whatever drug-of-choice they’re using with the rest of us.  There’s no ‘exceptionalism’ here ~ just another oligarchy with no principles, no rule of Law and little, if any ‘honor’ remaining.

We Americans need to understand that subverting the election “MEANS” that there has been an overthrow of their government.  Looked at another way, if, through a lot of shenanigans and cheating within the Vatican’s Secret Conclave, a well known Rabbi was placed in the position of supreme pontiff of the ‘Catholic Church’ and the College of Cardinals were found to be, in fact, a bunch of muslim Imams would the 1.2 billion Catholics in the world still believe the Vatican was legitimately the epicenter of the “Catholic Church” and follow the dictates of a Rabbinical Pontiff and his band of muslim Imams just because the Vatican flag still flew over Rome?

Likewise, any legitimacy the united States had as a free Republic, having a representative government that derived their authority from the People is gone when illegal and un-Constitutional means are accepted to subvert an election.  The fact the American national flag is still allowed to fly means no more than seeing any other defunct national flag flying, such as a Tsarist flag, the flag of Rhodesia or the Imperial German flag, when the governments represented by those flags have been relegated to the dust-bin of history.  Flying the flag of an overthrown nation indicates nostalgia rather than reality.

What amazes me is when you consider the Oath sworn by anyone in government not the least of which are members of our armed forces.  One swears that he/she does: “solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same”.  How many Americans, having watched the events of the 2020 election, believe in their hearts that the election was screwed with and the resulting fraud has placed an unelected regime in power that did NOT lawfully win the election?  If this regime did not actually win the election then our Constitution has been usurped and government overthrown.  If our Constitution has been usurped then any ‘orders’ issued by these people or their minions are unlawful.  In fact, the belief that the election was, in fact, illegally carried out means the very Oath sworn not only precludes following any orders coming down their chain of command but REQUIRES such an Oath taker to not just “bear true faith” to our Constitution but to actively “defend” it by any means necessary in order to restore a lawful Constitutional government.  Were we to guess the military were 60% republican and 40% democrat it probably equates to half the military believing this country has been overthrown.  Where are those half a million service people on their Oath? 

People having taken that Oath to “support and defend the Constitution” and then choosing not to do so are choosing their ‘job security’ over fulfilling their Oath to their fellow American People and our Constitution.  They’re hoping that the precedent set after WW2, that the “Nuremberg defense” was no defense at all won’t come into play for them.  The “Nuremberg defense” was the claim made by many defendants at Nuremberg, be they members of the military, law enforcement, firefighters, or the civilian population, when they claimed they were not guilty of “crimes” because they were simply “following orders” of their superiors or government officials.  The Germans referred to it as “Befehl ist Befehl” wherein they should be excused of any culpability relating to ‘oppression’ since they were required to follow orders and obey their superiors.  Fact is, “following orders” didn’t work out well as a defense for them.

Thinking one can ‘go along to get along’ might not be as sound a mind-set as thought because if one’s not willing to take a principled stand when criminals overthrow your government it’s not likely to get easier to take a principled stand when they order you to lock up (or execute) your neighbors.  Just saying…

People need to stop talking about “their democracy” being “threatened” in the light of their election being stolen.  Simply put, you don’t HAVE any democracy or Republic when the results of an election are overturned and NOT resisted in any meaningful way.  It’s really time people get over this.  Defrauding an election by un-Constitutional means and then installing the criminals who hatched the scheme is establishing a tyranny.  Following orders to perpetuate the tyranny is treason.  Given that, it seems to me, it should now be clear to almost anyone who can still fog a mirror, that we should dispense with any references to living in a “Republic” and should finally put a fork in all that “home of the brave” stuff that people like to banter about.  

Just an opinion, of course, but one derived from observing ‘obvious’ current events.

2020 & The ‘Social Contract’

Given the current state of affairs with the united States and reflecting on my college years, I ponder what’s meant by the phrase a “social contract” in the context of government and specifically in the context of “legitimate government”.  This concept, of a “contract” based state or government was articulated in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s 1762 treatise. In our case, that “contract” was our Constitution.  In it, we described specific limitations of power we were granting to government and that the government could NOT (“lawfully”) overstep these limitations.  When one side of that contractual agreement, unilaterally states the terms of the agreement have ‘changed’ or are no longer in force, or won’t be enforced, by anyone’s standards, that contract ~ the original agreement ~ is voided.  Some (‘liberals’) think this concept dating back to 1762, upon which our country was founded, no longer applies.  They (though they may be unaware or book read sufficiently to recognize it) adhere more towards a totalitarian Machiavellian mind-set rather than anything our nation’s founders had in mind ~ that the end justifies the means.

With the events surrounding the 2020 ‘election’ we, as a country, have crossed that Rubicon.  We must acknowledge that there are now two trains of thought within America.  Those who can justify in their minds unilateral changes to the social contract that once bound the country together and those who believe those are illegal acts and won’t accept the new paradigm.  It’s important to note that every individual elected, appointed and/or hired by the government must swear an Oath to our Constitution.  That Oath articulated in 5 U.S. Code § 3331 articulates that the Oath taker “will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same”

One could document a litany of examples of illegalities perpetrated against our country in this last election.  Pristine (unmailed) ballots for Biden (100s of thousands of them) showing up just when & where they were needed, dead people voting, the media outwardly violating the Constitutional protections of “free speech” and “free press”, in support of a falsified election, unilateral censorship of a sitting US president and everyone else that remotely supported him and a plethora of other illegal irregularities.  In one state alone more than 600,000 MORE absentee ballots were received (and counted for Biden) than were sent out to voters to use.  There are, for most of us, too many to comprehend and listing them gives too many ‘vectors’ to argue.  Cutting through the BS, it boils down to simply this ~ if you feel you can ‘accept’ that states allowed minor election officials, lower court judges or even Secretaries of State to make unconstitutional changes to election procedures without the ‘lawful’ approvals by the representative state legislatures and thus violating their Constitutions as well as our federal Constitution, then you are part of the “new paradigm”.  By accepting this you have accepted not just a breach in our Constitutional Law but are fine with enabling fraud, cheating, subverting & concealing fraud by those states election commissions.  By accepting this you have accepted that free and fair elections in this country can be overturned by some cabal and the American People’s Right to a free and fair election comes second to your interests and the interests of that cabal.

With whatever ‘due respect’ you may think you’re due ~ if you feel you can ‘accept’ all these states making last minute, unConstitutional changes to voting criteria without their legislature’s lawful approval/authorization in order to effect the outcome of this election, then you are, quite simply, a statist with no loyalty to this country, its People or its foundations.  You are, in my humble opinion, a piece of shit that needs to be scraped from the Docksiders of the American public.  You are a traitor to what was once a Constitutional ‘Republic’ ~ the United States of America.  If you find yourself ‘offended’ by my conclusions let me just be clear about the fact that I really don’t give a fuck.  Nor, it’s pretty safe to say, does more than half this country.  To quote an American euphemism, you made this bed and now you and your ilk will have to lie in it.  Or, to use another American euphemism in the current context:   ‘There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammo box.’  To address the leftists in 2020, the conservatives have, indeed, used the soap box, they have used the ballot box and they even tried the jury box.  Alas, these traitors, having cheated and defrauded their fellow Americans at every “box” they’ve turned to.  Barring some miracle they appear to be leaving real Americans that last box. I hope not but I can’t imagine this being acceptable ~ time will tell: